Cool experiment. A few years ago I was pretty against E85, I just didn't see the point with the cost of upgraded fuel system components in "some" cars. Now with the Redeyes coming with dual pumps, aftermarket dual pump setups being less expensive, plug and play, etc, I think the only other add on is the larger injector. If you have E85 pumps in your area it's a no brainer ESPECIALLY compared to gasoline.
Having had both, these cars really like E85 even cruising around there's a big difference on how they drive. I did run some oil analysis and did not find a need to change oil more frequently. Caveat, I drive my cars all the time so they never "sit" which may be where the oil change frequency has to be more often.
Thanks for the input Speedy!
The focus on the test was power gains or losses.
In the past on lower powered cars ( <800 whp on our dyno - stock Hellcat makes approx 620 whp) switching to ethanol did not yield reasonable power gains over race fuel.
However, on our race Hellcat we did switch to ethanol for the safety factor. Due to the power level we could not measure power gains or losses since it would not hook on the dyno.
On the current race Hellcat we have switched to methanol which has an entire list of other factors to consider (including no longer needing to run a radiator or cooling system).
I agree that if you have reasonably priced E85 readily available and a car that already is equipped from the factory with dual pumps you have a strong basis to run ethanol.
The even stronger basis for you is that your car has a true ethanol content sensor which eliminates the responsibility/prudence of testing the ethanol content at the pump every time you stop to get fuel.
I know quite a few folks running E85 do not test ethanol content at the pump. If they are filling up on their way to the track and end up with a batch of E60 when being aggressively tuned for E85/E90 it might not be a good situation.